Doctor Search

Search Results 0

1. Select your Country:
2. Enter your Location:
3. Show listings within:
mi km


Powered By ZipCodeShop

Newsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter
Weekly Newsletter


Receive HTML?

Liposuction Newsfeed

Liposuction newsfeed

Login Form






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Website that criticizes plastic surgeon is legal, court rules PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 01 February 2007
A court has ruled that a website that was setup by a former patient to criticise the work of her plastic surgeon is perfectly legal, and has rejected his claim for defamation and attempts to have it shut down.
Plastic surgeon Jonathan Sykes had claimed that the website, www.mysurgerynightmare.com  setup by 33 year old Georgette Gilbert amounted to defamation of his professional character and should be shut down.

Ms. Gilberts contends that Dr. Sykes botched a brow lift performed on her over five separate surgical procedures. She says that the brow lift, performed in 2003, left her with a permanently surprised look, eyebrows higher than expected, unable to fully close her eyes and one eyebrow higher than the other. She did not accept the surgeon's assessment that the results of the brow lift were "good and improving".

In order to publicise her dissatisfaction with the brow lift, she launched her website in 2005, recounting her experience and seeking to inform and educate members of the public considering plastic surgery. She named Dr Sykes as the surgeon responsible for her procedure and went on to list other medical malpractice suits that were allegedly filed against him. She also included before and after photos of the brow lift procedure.

In response, Dr. Sykes asked Ms. Gilbert to close down the website. When she refused, he launched a lawsuit, claiming that the website was defamatory and caused him emotional distress and loss of business. He also claimed that the "after" photos on the website had been taken after "additional and significant cosmetic surgery procedures" had been performed, but not by him.

Ms. Gilbert then responded to this lawsuit by saying that she was merely exercising her right of free speech in a public forum and in connection with a matter of public interest.

After a series of rulings, the California Court of Appeal said that the website was allowed, dismissing his claims because he was a "limited purpose public figure".

Justice M. Kathleen Butz explained,

“Sykes’s sought-after prominence as an expert in and advocate for plastic surgery as a means of personal enhancement transformed him into a limited purpose public figure. As such, statements alleging that his surgical procedures resulted in disfigurement or required expensive multiple corrective surgeries are entitled to constitutional protection.”

Justice Butz said that Dr Sykes, in order to shut down the website, would need to provide clear and convincing evidence that the statements made by Ms. Gilberts were false and that they were published with malice.
Comments (0) >> feed
Write comment

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
eBay Bargains Copyright © 2008 lipo.com